Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Oilleli v. d. Schmiede
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Oilleli v. d. Schmiede
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Astor v. Lahntal and Dam Nesta v. Wasserplatz
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Nesta v. Wasserplatz50.00011
    Astor v. Lahntal50.00011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Fichte v. Twistesee25.00011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Graf Nelha12.50011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald12.50011
    Aury v. Waidbosch12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri12.50011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst12.50022
    Laura v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Dina v. Twistesee12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Farah v. Minatal6.25011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.25011
    Ondra v. Lossetal6.25011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Bessy v. Twistesee6.25011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau6.25011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.24022
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.24022
    Fanni v. Osterfeld3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Esso v. Oberleis3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Alf v.d. Goldenen Aue3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Exy v. Minatal3.12011
    Eike v. Lossetal3.12011
    Ostia De Wynen3.12011
    Eggi v. Bruckhof3.12011
    Irrwisch De Wynen3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Hasso v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Bosco v. Rotenberg3.12011
    Cilly v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Otti v. Faistenau3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s