Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Isa v. Rehbrunn
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Isa v. Rehbrunn
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ingo v. Averbeck and Dam Xara v. Kampstüh
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Xara v. Kampstüh50.00011
    Ingo v. Averbeck50.00011
    Kuno v. d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Danny v. Averbeck25.00011
    Anton v. Steinbachtal25.00011
    Vina v. Kampstüh25.00011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Pia v. Kampstüh12.50011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Anka v. Rothsee12.50011
    Hardy v. Paradies12.50011
    Cora v. Heek12.50011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Bathys v. Heidmoor12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach9.370211
    Quell v. Huntetal9.370211
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg6.25011
    Moni v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Rike v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Laika v. Kampstüh6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Elch v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Dele v. Paradies6.25011
    Isko v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Anka v. Heek6.25011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Beste v. Hegholz3.12011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Anuschka v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Ira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Annett v. Paradies3.12011
    Mirko v. Jurawald3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Halla v. Linduri3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Igor v. Perverberg3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s