Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Cleo v. Lotten
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Cleo v. Lotten
    COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ingo v. Averbeck and Dam Dolly v. Großen Herzberg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)67
    Ancestor Loss-5
    Ancestor Loss in %108.06 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Ingo v. Averbeck50.00011
    Dolly v. Großen Herzberg50.00011
    Bill v. Bessingslust25.00011
    Anton v. Steinbachtal25.00011
    Anton v. d. Klosterwiese25.00011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe25.00011
    Danny v. Averbeck25.00011
    Alice v. Großen Herzberg25.00011
    Citta v. Arlsberg12.50011
    Westfalen's Artus12.50011
    Bill v. Straufhain12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Cora v. Heek12.50011
    Cleo v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Drauf v. d. Lindenhöhe12.50011
    Hardy v. Paradies12.50011
    Cessie v. Holundereck12.50011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.36033
    Falk v. Waldsteinberg6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Anka v. Heek6.25011
    York Frankundfrei6.25011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Amsel v. Windenhof6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Asti v. Windenhof6.25011
    Pom v. Minatal6.25011
    Arko v. Fischerwinkel6.25011
    Dingo v. Spitzberg6.25011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Cora v. Waldsteinberg6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Ulla Frankundfrei6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Crak v. Waldsteinberg6.24022
    Cora v.d. Lindenhöhe6.24022
    Jupp Frankundfrei6.24022
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Anka v. Guten Forst3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Boris v. Feuersang3.12011
    Arko v. Habichtshof3.12011
    Kora v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Nora v. Minatal3.12011
    Janka Frankundfrei3.12011
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Gil Z Prazce3.12011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Jule Frankundfrei3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Etina z Chotovskych3.12011
    Asta v. Wasenberg3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Arras v. Elfhaüsen3.12011
    Luca Frankundfrei3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s