Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Icon v. Horum
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Icon v. Horum
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Astor v. Iberg and Dam Indra v. d. Edelesse
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)55
    Ancestor Loss7
    Ancestor Loss in %88.71 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Astor v. Iberg50.00011
    Indra v. d. Edelesse50.00011
    Frieda v. Wolfethal25.00011
    Cicero v. Eulenspiegel25.00011
    Gero v. Alt-Hümmling25.00011
    Xenia v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Otti v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Ayla A. d. Holzland12.50011
    Dagobert v. Hege-Haus DK12.50011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling12.50011
    Cita v. Hollbäck12.50011
    Rocky v. Neuarenberg DK12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.36033
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Fara v. Bussenhof6.25011
    Aline KS v. Schwarzen Adler DK6.25011
    Ando v. Birkengehege6.25011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher6.25011
    Aischa v. Heek6.25011
    Nougat KS v. Hege-Haus DK6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Joy KS v. Hege-Haus DK6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Aska v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Quent v. Wittekind DK6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Laika v. Linduri3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Westfalen's Birka3.12011
    Lukas v. Wittekind (DK)3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011
    Era v. Wittekind (DK)3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Wassow Rothenuffeln (DK)3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Hedda v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Era v. d. Wacht im Walde (DK)3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Aron v. Averbeck3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s