Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Hasko v. Waldberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Hasko v. Waldberg
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Laslo v. Schlemminer Forst and Dam Gilla v. Fliethbachtal
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.270%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Laslo v. Schlemminer Forst50.00011
    Gilla v. Fliethbachtal50.00011
    Dascha v. Fliethbachtal25.00011
    Ben v. Kiekenbruch25.00011
    Galli Il v. Schlemminer Forst25.00011
    Alex v. Murner See25.00011
    Benja v. Fliethbachtal12.50011
    Elkan v. Linebrok12.50011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau12.50011
    Anjuscha v. Schlemminer Forst12.50011
    Yda v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Grandl De Wynen12.50011
    Karlo v. Linebrok12.50011
    Westfalen's Cäsar12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Hella v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Gora v. Linebrok6.25011
    Bonny v. Brückhof6.25011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Xanthippe De Wynen6.25011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Gabi v.d. Röthaller6.25011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese6.25011
    Perro Nelha6.25011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Zuska v. Schlemminer Forst6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Mando De Wynen3.12011
    Corda v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Assel v. Jürgenstorf3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Orion De Wynen3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Pascal De Wynen3.12011
    Iska v. Werneck3.12011
    Xorro De Wynen3.12011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Cina v. d. Röthaller3.12011
    Cora v. Karwald3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s