Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Frontrunner's Amal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Frontrunner's Amal
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Sokrates v. d. Hafkesdell and Dam Anka v. Brägel
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.930%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Anka v. Brägel50.00011
    Sokrates v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Dany v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Westfalen's Artus25.00011
    Anton v. d. Klosterwiese25.00011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Lukas v. Auwelt12.50011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Dina Chamavia9.370211
    Arco v. Backemeer9.370211
    Arras v. Eikenloh9.370211
    Kora v. Königsfeld6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.25011
    Juwel v. Perverberg6.25011
    Alf v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Imme v. Auwelt6.25011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Esta v. Auwelt3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Erko v. Jahnplatz3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Arko v. Abtswald3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Uta Chamavia3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Josi v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s