Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Daimy v. d. Schmiede
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Daimy v. d. Schmiede
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Faust v. d. Mainauen and Dam Yinka v. d. Schmiede
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Yinka v. d. Schmiede50.00011
    Faust v. d. Mainauen50.00011
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Bara v.d. Mainauen25.00011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Katta v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Debby v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle12.50011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg12.50011
    Nixe v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Etzel Aus Moor Und Heide12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Perle v. Buchheim6.25011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch6.25011
    Artus v. Elztal6.25011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Ussa v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Akira v. Birkengehege6.25011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.24022
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.24022
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede6.24022
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Laika v. Linduri3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Dachs v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Mira v. Linduri3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s