Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Tessa v. d. Horstbüschen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Tessa v. d. Horstbüschen
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Janko v. Huntetal and Dam Pia v. d. Horstbüschen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)55
    Ancestor Loss7
    Ancestor Loss in %88.71 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Janko v. Huntetal50.00011
    Pia v. d. Horstbüschen50.00011
    Dark v. d. Vorheide25.00011
    Heidi II v. Huntetal25.00011
    Neele v.d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Arco v. Hautzerfeld25.00011
    Kim v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen12.50022
    Lucky v. Heesenhof12.50011
    Yla v. Huntetal12.50011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen12.50022
    Dina v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Anton v. Steinbachtal12.50011
    Illo v. d. Trave12.50011
    Kuno v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Walburga v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Westfalen's Cuno6.25011
    Anka v. Rothsee6.25011
    Happy v. d. Trave6.25011
    Aikfried v. Murner See6.25011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein6.25011
    Flocke v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Valeska v. Huntetal6.25011
    Dark v. d. Himmerner Heide6.25011
    Tessa v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.24022
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.24022
    Moni v. Tillplatz6.24022
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg6.24022
    Quell v. Huntetal6.24022
    Vicky v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Elch v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Birko v. Tannengarten3.12011
    Enzo v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Cessy v. d. Trave3.12011
    Grandl De Wynen3.12011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Perro Nelha3.12011
    Rena v. Elbufer3.12011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Greif v. Reitbach3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Debby v. Emsdeich3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s