Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Nena v. Reitbach
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Nena v. Reitbach
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Arco v. Hautzerfeld and Dam Jane v. Reitbach
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Arco v. Hautzerfeld50.00011
    Jane v. Reitbach50.00011
    Sepp Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Gora v. Reitbach25.00011
    Anton v. Steinbachtal25.00011
    Dina v. Ziegelweiher25.00011
    Rika v. Linduri15.620211
    Arras v. Eschbach15.620211
    Westfalen's Birka12.50011
    Anka v. Rothsee12.50011
    Aikfried v. Murner See12.50011
    Paula Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch12.50011
    Arco v. Backemeer9.370211
    Nostra De Wynen6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Elch v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Gauner v. Stockey6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Grandl De Wynen6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Gilla De Wynen3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Igor v. Perverberg3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden3.12011
    Erlo De Wynen3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Xanthippe De Wynen3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s