Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Abbie v. d. Rieth
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Abbie v. d. Rieth
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Calle v. d. Reutereiche and Dam Gräfin Hanni v. Hollbäck
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 3.320%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)70
    Ancestor Loss-8
    Ancestor Loss in %112.90 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Io v. Buchheim50.00011
    Locke v. Buchheim50.00011
    Gräfin Hanni v. Hollbäck50.00011
    Calle v. d. Reutereiche50.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach43.7503111
    Egon v. Buchheim37.500211
    Cilly v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Hardy v. Heek25.00011
    Heinz v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Horneth v. Buchheim25.00011
    Bessy v.d. Reutereiche25.00011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Rika v. Linduri21.8703111
    Arras v. Eschbach21.8703111
    Rivkah v. Buchheim18.750211
    Westfalen's Chef18.750211
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern15.620321
    Basko v. Tannengarten12.50011
    Asta v. Averbeck12.50011
    Unken v. Buchheim12.50011
    Hektor v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Andra v.d. Reutereiche12.50011
    Caesar v. Holdergrund12.50011
    Anja v. Veybach12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.490312
    Amsel v. Silbergrund9.370211
    Gina v. Roonstein9.370211
    Osca Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Arras v. Eikenloh9.370211
    Lilli v. Buchheim9.370211
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg9.370211
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
    Jule v. Linduri6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Bonny v. Erdinger Moos6.25011
    Heido v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Milla v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Nixe v. Buchheim6.25011
    Aika v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Ira v. Stockey6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Herman v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Tanja De Wynen3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Gusti v. Stockey3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s