Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Elbert v. d. Soester Bergen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Elbert v. d. Soester Bergen
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire and Dam

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Farah v. Kappelbuck50.00011
    Harras v. Forst Ostenwalde50.00011
    Arthus v. Kandelwald25.00011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Samson v. Linduri25.00011
    Quelle v. Buchheim25.00011
    Distel v. Buchheim15.620211
    Aiko v. Aischtal12.50011
    Dachs v. Wietensholt12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Laura v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Anka v. Deutschen Orden12.50011
    Hesta v. Linduri12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Gitta v. Buchheim6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Lord v. Jurawald6.25011
    Antje v. Buchheim6.25011
    Britta v. Distelberg6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Conny v. Wietensholt6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.24022
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Kasper Vun'N. Wischhoff3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Dax Nelha3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Osca v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung3.12011
    Janka v. Wasserschloss3.12011
    Cera v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Carla v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s