Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Yule v. d. Riedleite
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Yule v. d. Riedleite
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bento Bavaria and Dam Silva v. d. Riedleite
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bento Bavaria50.00011
    Silva v. d. Riedleite50.00011
    Gina L v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Jesko v. Heek25.00011
    Max v. d. Riedleite25.00011
    Janka v. d. Riedleite25.00011
    Basco v. Matzental12.50011
    Foko v. Erlengrund12.50011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Westfalen's Chef12.50011
    Cora v. Heek12.50011
    Bonie v. Keltenquell12.50011
    Farah v. Kappelbuck12.50011
    Hardy v. Paradies12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege6.25011
    Orka v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Anka v. Heek6.25011
    Quelle v. Buchheim6.25011
    Fabo v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Dele v. Paradies6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Aika v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Karlo v. Linebrok6.25011
    Asta v. Pamesgrub6.25011
    Mona v. Linduri6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Isko v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Arthus v. Kandelwald6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Dachs v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Aiko v. Aischtal3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Gora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Annett v. Paradies3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011
    Anka v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Birka v. Hasenkamp3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Laika v. Linduri3.12011
    Perro Nelha3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Tanja De Wynen3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Cord v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Bessy v. Ahnherrn3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s