Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Yessy v. Linduri
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Yessy v. Linduri
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Karlo v. Linebrok and Dam Senta v. Linduri
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.051%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Senta v. Linduri50.00011
    Karlo v. Linebrok50.00011
    Perro Nelha25.00011
    Hesta v. Linduri25.00011
    Gora v. Linebrok25.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp15.620211
    Solojäger's Granne12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek12.50011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel12.50011
    Basko v. Bucheneck12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee9.370211
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Cora v. Linebrok6.25011
    Astor v. d. Weide6.25011
    Asra v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen6.25011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Becas v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle6.25011
    Groll v. Huntetal6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Eyko v. Arlsberg3.12011
    Elvi v. Lossetal3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Anka v. Jagenberg3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Afra v. Seggehorn3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Quecke v. Haberland3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Edda v. Haselbusch3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Pitt v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s