Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Benji v. Hogebögen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Benji v. Hogebögen
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ben v. Kiekenbruch and Dam Gela v. Waotertimpen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gela v. Waotertimpen50.00011
    Ben v. Kiekenbruch50.00011
    Yda v. d. Binnenelbe25.00011
    Westfalen's Cäsar25.00011
    Cody v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Asta v. Mellin25.00011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Hasko v. Linebrok12.50011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld12.50011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg12.50011
    Basko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Gabi v.d. Röthaller12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Isa v. Stockey12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Herman v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Elfe v. Linebrok6.25011
    Dolly Nelha6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Nimrods Enno6.25011
    Mirco v. Linduri6.25011
    Certa v. Hülsebusch6.25011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Cina v. d. Röthaller6.25011
    Gusti v. Stockey6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Nixe v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Baron v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Birke Nelha3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Wanda v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Artus v. Elztal3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Quacks v. Lossetal3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Dina v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s