Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Urban v. Buchheim
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Urban v. Buchheim
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Faust v. d. Mainauen and Dam Locke v. Buchheim
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.855%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Faust v. d. Mainauen50.00011
    Locke v. Buchheim50.00011
    Horneth v. Buchheim25.00011
    Bara v.d. Mainauen25.00011
    Egon v. Buchheim25.00011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle12.50011
    Westfalen's Chef12.50011
    Caesar v. Holdergrund12.50011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim12.50011
    Unken v. Buchheim12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg12.50011
    Debby v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Artus v. Elztal6.25011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Heido v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Perle v. Buchheim6.25011
    Lilli v. Buchheim6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Nixe v. Buchheim6.25011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Akira v. Birkengehege6.25011
    Bonny v. Erdinger Moos6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Distel v. Buchheim6.24022
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Laika v. Linduri3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Andra v. Buchheim3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Dachs v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Ikarus v. Buchheim3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bella v. Muggental3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s