Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Cen v. d. Reutereiche
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Cen v. d. Reutereiche
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Heinz v. Rodekopp and Dam Bessy v.d. Reutereiche
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bessy v.d. Reutereiche50.00011
    Heinz v. Rodekopp50.00011
    Andra v.d. Reutereiche25.00011
    Hektor v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Egon v. Buchheim25.00011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Westfalen's Chef12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Ira v. Stockey12.50011
    Debby v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Aika v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim12.50011
    Samson v. Linduri12.50011
    Lilli v. Buchheim6.25011
    Gusti v. Stockey6.25011
    Herman v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Tanja De Wynen6.25011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Artus v. Elztal3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Vulkan De Wynen3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Ikarus v. Buchheim3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Jolly De Wynen3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Ondra v. Lossetal3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Dina v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s