Pedigree Analysis

Generations

Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Bullenbarger's Ari

This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

COI Calculation - Bullenbarger's Ari

COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!

COI Calculation - Sire Hardy v. Heek and Dam Hanni v. Fliethbachtal

Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)

This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

# of dogs
Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
Ancestor Loss2
Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

Contributing Ancestors

AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
Hanni v. Fliethbachtal50.00011
Hardy v. Heek50.00011
Asta v. Averbeck28.120211
Fee v. Fliethbachtal25.00011
Greif v. Reitbach25.00011
Ando v. Hollbäck25.00011
Rika v. Linduri12.50011
Basko v. Alt-Hümmling12.50011
Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
Dascha v. Fliethbachtal12.50011
Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
Karlo v. Linebrok6.25011
Euro v. Blumenhof6.25011
Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
Aischa v. Heek6.25011
Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
Benja v. Fliethbachtal6.25011
Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
Solojäger's Laura6.25011
Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
Uri v. Bärenhorst3.12011
Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
Birka v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
Perro Nelha3.12011
Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
Bonny v. Brückhof3.12011
Bryka v.d.Röthaller3.12011
Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
Gora v. Linebrok3.12011
Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
Lucie Nelha3.12011
Solojäger's Harras3.12011
Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
Igor v. Linebrok3.12011
Last updated Tuesday 19 March 2019 08:59 CET


I have 🍪s