Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Enya v. Großen Herzberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Enya v. Großen Herzberg
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Freddy v. Hollbäck and Dam Anouk v.d. Weuleskath
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Anouk v.d. Weuleskath50.00011
    Freddy v. Hollbäck50.00011
    Max v. Wuddelhof25.00011
    Cilly v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Hardy v. d. Wallburg25.00011
    Bille v. Großen Herzberg25.00011
    Cleo v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Sepp Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Janka v. Wuddelhof12.50011
    Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Hektor v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Vroni v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege12.50011
    Pom v. Minatal6.25011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Gerrit v. Wuddelhof6.25011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Laika v. Linduri6.25011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch6.25011
    Paula Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Nora v. Minatal3.12011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Westfalen's Artus3.12011
    Dixi v. Wuddelhof3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Nostra De Wynen3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s