Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Bessy v. Rotholz
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Bessy v. Rotholz
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Over v. d. Hafkesdell and Dam Urmel v. Linduri
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Urmel v. Linduri50.00011
    Over v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Hesta v. Linduri25.00011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck25.00011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel15.620211
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp15.620211
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald12.50011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg12.50011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Dina Chamavia6.25011
    Astor v. d. Weide6.25011
    Farah v. Minatal6.25011
    Ossy De Wynen6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.25011
    Troll v. Rheinufer6.25011
    Alf v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau6.25011
    Erko v. Jahnplatz3.12011
    Anja v. Salinenblick3.12011
    Josi v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Otti v. Faistenau3.12011
    Afra v. Seggehorn3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Alf v.d. Goldenen Aue3.12011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Rig Chamavia3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Exy v. Minatal3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Arko v. Abtswald3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Alf v. Geierling3.12011
    Itta De Wynen3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Esso v. Oberleis3.12011
    Gilla v. Reinufer3.12011
    Uta Chamavia3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s