Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Kuno v. Hasenkamp
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Kuno v. Hasenkamp
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hardy v. d. Wallburg and Dam Joy v. Hasenkamp
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Joy v. Hasenkamp50.00011
    Hardy v. d. Wallburg50.00011
    Lea v. Auwelt25.00011
    Sepp Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Hektor v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Vroni v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Imme v. Auwelt12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Paula Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Debby v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz9.370211
    Arras v. Eikenloh9.370211
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Esta v. Auwelt6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Nostra De Wynen6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Erlo De Wynen3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Asta Westerode3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Gilla De Wynen3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Brutus v. Stockey3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s