Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Esco v. Rothsee
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Esco v. Rothsee
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Fritz v. Kiekenbruch and Dam Birka v. Rothsee
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Fritz v. Kiekenbruch50.00011
    Birka v. Rothsee50.00011
    Clara v. Kiekenbruch25.00011
    Drago v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Solojäger's Unkas25.00011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden25.00011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Solojäger's Maraun12.50011
    Yda v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Ivo v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Aika v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Igor v. Perverberg12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.25011
    Gitta v. Buchheim6.25011
    Jola Nelha6.25011
    Tanja De Wynen6.25011
    Lord v. Jurawald6.25011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Gabi v.d. Röthaller6.25011
    Grille v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Xaver v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Dax Nelha6.24022
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Ondra v. Lossetal3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Asco v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Cina v. d. Röthaller3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Bessi v. Winterberg3.12011
    Rosa v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Vulkan De Wynen3.12011
    Jolly De Wynen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s