Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Irwisch v. Poppenforst
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Irwisch v. Poppenforst
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Zoff v. Poppenforst and Dam Lindemann's Akita
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Zoff v. Poppenforst50.00011
    Lindemann's Akita50.00011
    Hedda v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Elli v. Heek25.00011
    Anton v. d. Klosterwiese25.00011
    Basco v. Matzental25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Orka v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Anka v. Heek12.50011
    Westfalen's Chef12.50011
    Gera v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Asta v. Pamesgrub12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Asta v. Averbeck6.25011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Cord v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Igor v. Linebrok6.25011
    Bessy v. Ahnherrn6.25011
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Arko v. Kammerforst3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Bella v. Peigarten3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Kent v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Gina v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s