Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Gela v. Horum
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Gela v. Horum
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Max v. d. Horstbüschen and Dam Fichte v. Horum
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Fichte v. Horum50.00011
    Max v. d. Horstbüschen50.00011
    Indra v. d. Edelesse25.00011
    Quell v. Linebrok25.00011
    Elvis v. Horum25.00011
    Kim v. d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Frieda v. Wolfethal12.50011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Wilco v. Huntetal12.50011
    Cicero v. Eulenspiegel12.50011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Perle v. Linebrok12.50011
    Chef v. Seulingswald12.50011
    Bea v. Calveslage12.50011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Cora v. Bonrechtern6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Dagobert v. Hege-Haus DK6.25011
    Gauner v. Stockey6.25011
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Dan v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Ibse v. Linebrok6.25011
    Lara v. Linebrok6.25011
    Rocky v. Neuarenberg DK6.25011
    Karlo v. Linebrok6.25011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg6.25011
    Moni v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Ayla A. d. Holzland6.25011
    Quendy v. Huntetal6.25011
    Henk v. Huntetal6.24022
    Arco v. Backemeer6.24022
    Maika v. Wiken6.24022
    Amor v. Butendieks3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Ira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Nougat KS v. Hege-Haus DK3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Gora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Joy KS v. Hege-Haus DK3.12011
    Ando v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Halla v. Linduri3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Perro Nelha3.12011
    Quent v. Wittekind DK3.12011
    Ambra v. Struthof3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Fara v. Bussenhof3.12011
    Aline KS v. Schwarzen Adler DK3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s