Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Caspar v. Laon
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Caspar v. Laon
    COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Freddy v. Hollbäck and Dam Gitta v. Frochtmannshof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gitta v. Frochtmannshof50.00011
    Freddy v. Hollbäck50.00011
    Max v. Wuddelhof25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach25.00011
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Cilly v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck18.750211
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Sepp Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Janka v. Wuddelhof12.50011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern9.370211
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg9.370211
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Juwel v. Perverberg6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Gerrit v. Wuddelhof6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Eddy v. Riehenbusch6.25011
    Paula Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.24022
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Dixi v. Wuddelhof3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Nostra De Wynen3.12011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s