Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Tristan v. Buchheim
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Tristan v. Buchheim
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Basko v. Aartal and Dam Orvett v. Buchheim
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Orvett v. Buchheim50.00011
    Basko v. Aartal50.00011
    Basca v. Mühbrooker Meer25.00011
    Locke v. Buchheim25.00011
    Axel v. Murner See25.00011
    Faust v. d. Mainauen25.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach18.750211
    Hanno v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Horneth v. Buchheim12.50011
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Egon v. Buchheim12.50011
    Grandl De Wynen12.50011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau12.50011
    Bara v.d. Mainauen12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri9.370211
    Arras v. Eschbach9.370211
    Arko v. d. Seewiese6.25011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege6.25011
    Caesar v. Holdergrund6.25011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle6.25011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Xanthippe De Wynen6.25011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim6.25011
    Westfalen's Chef6.25011
    Unken v. Buchheim6.25011
    Iska v. Werneck3.12011
    Bonny v. Erdinger Moos3.12011
    Pom v. Minatal3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Mando De Wynen3.12011
    Laika v. Linduri3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Artus v. Elztal3.12011
    Lilli v. Buchheim3.12011
    Heido v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Perle v. Buchheim3.12011
    Orion De Wynen3.12011
    Nixe v. Buchheim3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Cora v. Karwald3.12011
    Pascal De Wynen3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Akira v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s