Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Cyra v. Fasanenhof
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Cyra v. Fasanenhof
    COI 5 gen: 4.688%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Anton v. Haltergrund and Dam Yanna v. Fasanenhof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)70
    Ancestor Loss-8
    Ancestor Loss in %112.90 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Inga v. Forst Ostenwalde50.00011
    Ajax v. Eschbach50.00011
    Yanna v. Fasanenhof50.00011
    Anton v. Haltergrund50.00011
    Gina v. Roonstein31.250211
    Arras v. Eikenloh31.250211
    Hera v. Wasserplatz31.240312
    Ajax v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Pina v. Bonrechtern25.00011
    Tessa v. Fasanenhof25.00011
    Cid v. d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Anton v. d. Klosterwiese25.00011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck18.750211
    Burga v. d. Heustätte18.750211
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp15.620211
    Freya v. Roonstein15.620211
    Lucie Nelha15.620211
    Lukas v. Linduri15.620211
    Linda v. Fasanenhof12.50022
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Birko v. Tannengarten12.50011
    Pom v. Minatal12.50011
    Aika v. Lewitzgrund12.50011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50022
    Laura v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Dark v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.490312
    Bodo v. Steyerberg9.370211
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte9.370211
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck9.370211
    Arco v. Backemeer9.370211
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Juwel v. Perverberg6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Alo v. Burgstall6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Nora v. Minatal6.25011
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.25011
    Jenny v. Huckberg6.25011
    Ilka v. Bonrechtern6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Biene v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Preußen's Blitz6.25011
    Dandy v. Roonstein6.25011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Jule v. Linduri6.25011
    Elko v. Huntetal6.24022
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof6.24022
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Inka v. Rehhörn3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Pascha v. Elbufer3.12011
    Hasko v. Linebrok3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Asta v. Butendieks3.12011
    Troll v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Ossy De Wynen3.12011
    Franzi v. Stockey3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s