Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Conner vun de Möhl
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Conner vun de Möhl
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Lindemann's Bernie and Dam Anji vun de Möhl
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Lindemann's Bernie50.00011
    Anji vun de Möhl50.00011
    Alex v. Murner See25.00011
    Elli v. Heek25.00011
    Indi v. d. Trave25.00011
    Beere v. Rotholz25.00011
    Happy v. d. Trave12.50011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau12.50011
    Westfalen's Chef12.50011
    Urmel v. Linduri12.50011
    Grandl De Wynen12.50011
    Flocke v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Anka v. Heek12.50011
    Over v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide9.370211
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald9.36033
    Enzo v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Igor v. Linebrok6.25011
    Xanthippe De Wynen6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Asta v. Averbeck6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Cessy v. d. Trave6.25011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.24022
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Orion De Wynen3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Pascal De Wynen3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Jenka Vun'N. Wischhoff3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Iska v. Werneck3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Mando De Wynen3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Cora v. Karwald3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s