Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Alice vun de Möhl
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Alice vun de Möhl
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Indi v. d. Trave and Dam Beere v. Rotholz
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)56
    Ancestor Loss6
    Ancestor Loss in %90.32 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Indi v. d. Trave50.00011
    Beere v. Rotholz50.00011
    Over v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Happy v. d. Trave25.00011
    Urmel v. Linduri25.00011
    Flocke v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Hesta v. Linduri12.50011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Cessy v. d. Trave12.50011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide12.50022
    Enzo v. Wuddelhoff12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald12.50022
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Jenka Vun'N. Wischhoff6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau6.24022
    Farah v. Minatal6.24022
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.24022
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Cent v. Hofried3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Troll v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Eika Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Ossy De Wynen3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s