Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Benelli v. Lotten
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Benelli v. Lotten
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Anton v. Steinbachtal and Dam Dolly v. Großen Herzberg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Anton v. Steinbachtal50.00011
    Dolly v. Großen Herzberg50.00011
    Anka v. Rothsee25.00011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Anton v. d. Klosterwiese25.00011
    Alice v. Großen Herzberg25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach18.750211
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Elch v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden12.50011
    Westfalen's Artus12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Cleo v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Debby v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Gina v. Roonstein9.370211
    Arras v. Eikenloh9.370211
    Pom v. Minatal6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Igor v. Perverberg6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Aika v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Nora v. Minatal3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Xaver v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Kora v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Tanja De Wynen3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s